Europa Press This is the fine Sánchez will have to pay for campaigning in the EU Council
The Supreme Court confirms the fine of 2,200 euros to Pedro Sánchez for violating electoral neutrality
The Supreme Court has upheld the 2,200 euro fine imposed on President Pedro Sánchez by the Central Electoral Board. The sanction was for violating the principle of neutrality of public authorities during the electoral period.
The incident occurred after a press conference held on June 30, 2023. During that intervention, Sánchez praised his government's achievements and discredited his political opponents. This act took place just before the general elections.
The origin of the sanction
On June 30, 2023, Spain assumed the six-month presidency of the Council of the European Union. After this meeting, Sánchez held a press conference in Brussels. It was there where he was asked about topics such as immigration and post-electoral agreements between PP and VOX.
In his replys, Sánchez highlighted his government's achievements, especially in the economy. Despite this, he also made critical comments about the PP leader, Alberto Núñez Feijóo.
Pedro Sánchez's government filed an appeal with the Supreme Court against the sanction imposed by the Central Electoral Board. However, the Contentious-Administrative Chamber dismissed the appeal.
In its ruling, the Supreme Court upheld the 2,200 euro fine. The high court emphasized that Sánchez's statements at the press conference were a clear violation of the neutrality required during the electoral period.
The Supreme Court's ruling is based on Article 50.2 of the Organic Law of the General Electoral Regime (LOREG). This rule prohibits public officials from making critical assessments of electoral opponents in the period leading up to the elections.
The Court concluded that Sánchez's statements violated this prohibition. According to the law, public officials are required to maintain impartiality during the exercise of their functions in electoral times.
Political and social reactions
The confirmation of the fine has caused various political reactions. The Popular Party celebrated the Supreme Court's decision. They consider that this ruling protects the impartiality of the electoral process.
Meanwhile, members of the PSOE government consider that the fine is excessive. They claim it limits the freedom of expression of public officials. However, the ruling highlights the importance of neutrality in times of elections.
More posts: