
Latest: Thousands of Americans show their clear discontent with Verizon's latest move
The operator insists on pushing forward this proposal, which users strongly dislike and which will have consequences
Verizon has sparked a major controversy after requesting that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) change the rules affecting mobile phone users. Currently, it can only keep a phone locked to its network for 60 days after activation.
However, it has now asked for permission to extend that lock to six months or even longer. This proposal has caused strong opposition from consumer advocacy organizations, environmental groups, individual users, and small companies. They accuse the operator of trying to impose artificial barriers on the market.
According to Verizon, this measure aims to fight fraud, especially the theft of subsidized phones. It also seeks to level the playing field with other operators like AT&T or T-Mobile, which also apply long locks. The company states that the current 60 days are not enough to protect its business interests and stop the misuse of devices.

In addition, it claims that the new lock would help offer better deals and subsidies to its customers. However, these arguments haven't convinced those who believe that the proposal would negatively affect millions of consumers.
Verizon's proposal doesn't convince
Several organizations have asked the FCC to reject Verizon's petition. They warn that this measure would distort competition by making it harder to switch operators. By forcing users to stay with Verizon for at least six months, it limits the freedom to choose another company with better prices.
They also argue that this will increase costs for consumers and raise the generation of electronic waste. Many users who can't easily switch networks will choose to buy new phones. This worsens the environmental problem.
It is also pointed out that locking phones for such a long time significantly reduces the resale value of the devices. This harms the second-hand market and limits the options of those who can't afford a new phone.

Meanwhile, the justification of fraud is viewed with skepticism. Other operators with similar policies have also faced theft problems without the prolonged lock proving to be a solution. Opposing groups instead recommend improving fraud detection technology and strengthening cooperation with authorities.
Verizon causes widespread discontent
Thousands of citizens have sent comments to the FCC expressing their discontent with Verizon's request. Many believe that if a consumer buys a phone, they should have the right to use it freely with any operator. Some even report that they've left Verizon precisely because of restrictive policies like this one.
In addition, small and rural operators have also expressed their concern. They state that this measure would especially affect communities where coverage is limited and switching networks may be necessary to get better service.
More posts: