
The 'Anomalies' in the Timekeeping of Ábalos's Close Friend That Spark Controversy
Ineco has tried to disprove Jésica's version after she confessed that she wasn't working
Two Public Entities and Two Perspectives on Jésica Rodríguez's Performance After Her Testimony Before the Supreme Court. José Luis Ábalos's ex-partner told the judge that she was hired by Ineco. All this after an interview with Koldo García, who asked her:
"Do you know how to read and write? Well, that's it, you're hired."
Additionally, she confessed that she never went to the public company to perform her duties. This, despite having been employed from March 1, 2019, to February 28, 2021. She only showed up once to pick up a laptop, but she didn't perform any tasks and commented that she didn't receive any instructions regarding it.

"They never called me to work." This device only served her to take an occupational risk course and to clock in weekly, "but that was it."
All this happened under the supervision of Joseba García, Koldo's brother, who was supposedly her superior. Jésica added that it was Joseba himself who gave her instructions, insisting on the need to clock in punctually.

The public engineering company, linked to the Ministry of Transport, maintained total silence last week after Jésica's statements, as reported in this medium. It was not possible to contact any spokesperson or obtain explanations on the matter.
The truth is that the newspaper VozPópuli has highlighted the new "evidence" with which Ineco has wanted to refute that version. However, "anomalies" are observed in that timekeeping. It suggests the possibility that it was Joseba who was signing for Jésica.
Ineco wants to cling to that record, with anomalies, to defend that Jésica did go to work.
This Is the Crime Anticorruption Points to in the Koldo Case Over Jésica's Apartment
The Koldo case continues to reveal new information. The Anticorruption Prosecutor's Office directly points to the scheme for an alleged bribery offense, due to the use of a residence by Jésica. Which would have been financed by people close to businessman Víctor de Aldama.
Additionally, the stay of Ábalos in a chalet in La Alcaidesa (Cádiz) during a summer is being investigated. It also focuses on the alleged cash delivery to his former advisor, Koldo García.
The chief prosecutor, Alejandro Luzón, has detailed these facts in a report sent to the Supreme Court within the framework of the 'Koldo case'. His writing responds to the appeal filed by Ábalos, who requested the removal of the precautionary measures that prevent him from leaving Spain. The same measures that require him to appear every 15 days in court and involve the withdrawal of his passport.
Anticorruption supports the stance of Judge Leopoldo Puente, who maintains that there is sufficient evidence to consider Ábalos's possible involvement in criminal acts. As an example, he mentions the use by his then-partner of a residence funded by people close to Víctor de Aldama.
More posts: