Sánchez Faces Potential Legal Actions Over Begoña Gómez's Flights on the Falcon

The Government could face legal action for not disclosing Begoña Gómez's flights on the presidential Falcon.

The Transparency Council demanded Moncloa reveal Gómez's trips, but the Executive refuses to provide the required data.

The Council's resolution urged disclosure of destinations and reasons for the flights, as well as possible payments for tickets on commercial flights.

Moncloa has ignored the order and could be taken to court to force the release of the requested information.

Legal experts argue that the refusal to disclose aims to protect Gómez and that the judiciary could intervene to ensure transparency.

Judge Juan Carlos Peinado is investigating Gómez for alleged influence peddling, business corruption, and professional intrusion.

Seven bank accounts have been found in her name, with a total balance of 21,034.55 euros, according to the ongoing judicial investigation.

Businessman Víctor de Aldama claimed there are foreign accounts with more than six million dollars in Gómez's name.

However, the Prosecutor's Office dismissed the complaint due to a lack of conclusive evidence proving the existence of such accounts.

Gómez has a personal assistant funded with public money, as declared by Cristina Álvarez before Judge Peinado.

Emails confirm that the assistant managed tasks related to the chair that Gómez directs at the Complutense University.

Her salary ranges between 50,000 and 100,000 euros annually and she uses the communication systems of the Government Presidency.

Gómez's chair was funded by major tech companies that provided funds for the development of related projects.

Telefónica contributed 50,000 euros, Indra 128,442 euros, and Google allocated 110,000 euros for software development.

Work meetings related to the chair were held at Moncloa, according to data revealed in the investigation.

Moncloa still hasn't clarified whether Gómez has used state funds for private trips or activities related to her work.

The case generates criticism over the lack of transparency and the possible use of public resources for personal purposes.

If the judiciary acts, it could force Moncloa to disclose information about the president's wife's flights.