data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8222/c82223b8e8d49bfefb956925a2310731fde1e91a" alt="A man in a suit in front of a building with the word "Courts" on the facade."
The doubts about Pedro Sánchez's birth date that have raised alarms
According to a marriage certificate requested by Judge Juan Carlos Peinado, Sánchez's date of birth would be February 20, 1972, not February 29, 1972.
Pedro Sánchez is at the center of a controversy after a discrepancy was discovered regarding his birth date in official documents. According to a marriage certificate requested by Judge Juan Carlos Peinado, Sánchez's birth date would be February 20, 1972, not February 29, 1972. As indicated in other official documents submitted to the Congress of Deputies.
The marriage certificate of Pedro Sánchez and Begoña Gómez, requested by Judge Peinado, has revealed surprising information. The date on this document is February 20, 1972. While in the official documents of the Congress of Deputies, the president has indicated he was born on February 29, 1972.
This discrepancy has raised suspicions and caused questions about the veracity of the information presented by the leader.
The difference in dates is not a minor issue. The date of February 29 only exists in leap years, which raises even more doubts. If Sánchez's birth date were really February 29, 1972.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0cc0d/0cc0dd14ac6786cc96c603c0dc954d9e1ba6cda7" alt="Man in blue suit with green tie in front of a blue background. Man in blue suit with green tie in front of a blue background."
According to official records, the president would be younger than the age listed on the marriage certificate. This has led some to question whether this discrepancy is a simple error or if it hides something more significant.
Judge Juan Carlos Peinado is investigating Begoña Gómez, Pedro Sánchez's wife, for alleged crimes related to influence peddling and business corruption. To clarify the couple's marital regime, Peinado requested the marriage certificate of Sánchez and Gómez.
This request aims to verify whether the couple married under the regime of separation of property. Conversely, they married under the community property regime, which would imply a different distribution of their assets.
The marriage certificate reveals that Pedro Sánchez and Begoña Gómez married under the regime of separation of property. Which means that, legally, the assets acquired by each of them belong individually to the person who acquired them.
This is relevant in the context of Peinado's investigation. Since it allows determining how certain assets and funds might have been managed, especially in the framework of the accusations against Begoña Gómez.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/516e4/516e403fb38503e123294cf4a264d8735845f0f5" alt="Document from the Civil Registry of Madrid detailing the registration of a marriage between Pedro Sánchez Pérez-Castejón and María Begoña Gómez Fernández, under the regime of separation of assets, with a marriage date of June 9, 2006 and registration on July 5, 2006, authorized by the notary Trinidad Jiménez García-Herrera. Document from the Civil Registry of Madrid detailing the registration of a marriage between Pedro Sánchez Pérez-Castejón and María Begoña Gómez Fernández, under the regime of separation of assets, with a marriage date of June 9, 2006 and registration on July 5, 2006, authorized by the notary Trinidad Jiménez García-Herrera."
Marriage Date and Its Registration
The marriage of Pedro Sánchez and Begoña Gómez was held on June 9, 2006, at 6:00 PM at the Municipal Board of Centro de Madrid. The registration in the Civil Registry was carried out on July 5, 2006. The exact date of the ceremony and registration is key in the investigation, as it allows establishing a timeline for the couple's financial and legal decisions.
In the same order, Judge Peinado requested information about the bank accounts in which Begoña Gómez appeared as the account holder. This is an important step in the investigation. Since it could reveal details about the president's wife's finances and her possible connection to the crimes she is charged with.
More posts: