EDATV García Ortiz's communications director's confession: also changed her phone
Has also acknowledged that it was the attorney general himself who 'verbally' provided the information.
Attorney General García Ortiz remains surrounded by investigations for alleged disclosure of secrets. This Tuesday, the Director of Communications of the Attorney General's Office testified as a witness.
The witness maintained that at no time did she have access to the exchanged email. An email between the lawyer of Ayuso's boyfriend and the economic crimes prosecutor Julián Salto. However, she acknowledged that it was the Attorney General himself who verbally provided her with the information.
The same information used to draft the press release distributed to the media.
However, the surprising thing is that she confessed to having also changed her mobile device. She detailed that it was right after the high court opened a case against the Attorney General.
Something that served to justify the inability to access the data from March 13 and 14. Coincidentally, it matches the key days of the leak.
The Witnesses in Attorney General Ortiz's Case Clarify the Mobile Protocol
The State Attorney General, García Ortiz, is once again against the ropes. The witnesses' statements refuted and undermined Ortiz's justifications.
Specifically, last Thursday, January 16, both Almudena Lastra and Julián Salto testified as witnesses. Both have been responsible for dismantling García Ortiz's theories.
Similarly, they explained the reality of the protocol, which has little to do with deleting the content of the mobile phone.
Almudena Lastra defended, like prosecutor Julián Salto, that it doesn't exist in the Attorney General's Office. Specifically, the witness detailed that WhatsApp messages are not deleted when there is a change of terminal. What is carried out is an operation directed, in her case, by the Community of Madrid, and all the information from the old mobile is transferred to the new device.
García Ortiz won't be able to justify why the deletion was carried out.
It should be remembered that the UCO included in one of its reports that "0 messages" were found in messaging applications. Data extracted from the dump of Attorney General García Ortiz's mobile device.
A terminal that was seized by the Civil Guard during the search of his office. Shortly after, investigators confirmed that the highest representative of the Public Ministry had changed his mobile terminal five days before the search of his office.
That is, a week after the Supreme Court opened a case against him.
The statement of the digital delegate of the Madrid Prosecutor's Office would refute the version spread by sources from the State Attorney General's Office. If the wingere exposed by both witnesses is confirmed, García Ortiz won't be able to justify why the deletion was carried out.
It should be remembered that the UCO included in one of its reports that "0 messages" were found in messaging applications. Data extracted from the dump of Attorney General García Ortiz's mobile device.
A terminal that was seized by the Civil Guard during the search of his office. Shortly after, investigators confirmed that the highest representative of the Public Ministry had changed his mobile terminal five days before the search of his office.
More posts: