María Patiño Reveals the Latest on Anabel Pantoja and David Rodríguez: 'A Contradiction'

María Patiño has once again put the spotlight on the case of Anabel Pantoja and David Rodríguez, revealing key details about their statements. The host of Ni que fuéramos has added to the information provided by Paloma García-Pelayo about the inconsistencies in the couple's testimonies. "It's not a contradiction, one omits it and the other tells it," Patiño stated while analyzing the situation.

The controversy has gained more relevance due to the open investigation against the couple for alleged child abuse. Their baby was admitted to the Maternal and Child Hospital of Gran Canaria from January 9 to 27, which caused significant media attention. In this context, various sources have tried to shed light on what happened and clarify the contradictory versions of those involved.

The statements provided on television programs have raised questions about the relationship between the couple's testimonies. While Anabel didn't mention prior medical consultations before her daughter's crisis, David claimed that the child had received attention beforehand. Can the investigation clarify these discrepancies?

María Patiño Reveals the Latest on Anabel Pantoja and David Rodríguez

The couple's statements before the judge have raised suspicions among investigators. Anabel Pantoja stated that she received a call from her partner when the baby was already in crisis, without mentioning prior attention. However, David Rodríguez declared that the child had already been attended to before January 9, a fact absent in the forensic report.

Journalist Paloma García-Pelayo revealed that this discrepancy has led the judge to request a review of all previous medical reports. This decision aims to determine if there was a pre-existing condition that could be related to the crisis on the day of hospital admission.

The differences in versions have been interpreted in various ways by public opinion and television experts. Some consider it a understandable oversight, while others see it as a deliberate attempt to hide relevant information.

María Patiño highlighted Paloma García-Pelayo's statements on Y ahora Sonsoles and emphasized a key detail. "David speaks in his statement that, as a consequence of the birth, Anabel had a series of problems. And he adds something that left me stunned and seems important," she began saying.

According to the host, these problems mentioned led to differences in the couple. "I insist, this is told by colleague Paloma García-Pelayo, but David talks about problems in the couple," Patiño indicated.

However, the host wanted to emphasize that it was not a contradiction in their statements. "It's not a contradiction, one omits it and the other tells it," María Patiño assured in this regard.

However, Kiko Matamoros didn't agree with Patiño's interpretation and claimed that the differences in the accounts do constitute a contradiction. "It is contradictory because one account doesn't correspond with the other," he argued, generating a heated debate on the set.

The Media Impact and Unsolved Doubts

The case of Anabel Pantoja and David Rodríguez continues to spark great interest in public opinion. The ongoing investigation could bring new revelations that change the course of the process. Meanwhile, media coverage remains alert to every detail that may emerge in the coming days.

The television debate has highlighted the differences of opinion among collaborators about the relevance of the statements. Some consider it a simple omission, while others see it as a key point for the judicial investigation.

As the process progresses, new data is expected to come to light that will clarify the facts. The doubt about whether there was an intention to hide information or if it is simply inaccuracies remains in the air.

María Patiño has revealed new details about the case of Anabel Pantoja and David Rodríguez, highlighting an apparent contradiction in their statements. The host has closely followed every detail of the case, providing key information that has caused an intense debate in the media. What new revelations will the coming weeks bring?